FIPA | 19/04/96 14:04 |
FOUNDATION FOR INTELLIGENT PHYSICAL AGENTS | FIPA6411.doc |
Source: L. Chiariglione |
Resolutions of the London meeting
The following resolutions have been approved by a group of
individuals, whose names are given in the annex, from 26
companies and organisations, 8 countries and the communities
having a stake in agent technologies.
1. An international organisation, called FIPA, should be
established to promote the industry of Intelligent Physical
Agents (IPA). IPAs are meant to include all devices intended for
the mass market, capable of executing actions, to accomplish
goals imparted by or in collaboration with human beings or other
IPAs, with a high degree of intelligence.
2. The purpose of FIPA shall be pursued by: identifying, selecting, augmenting and developing in a timely fashion specifications of generic agent technologies that are usable across a large number of IPAs and provide a high level of interoperability with other applications.
The goals are realised through the open international
collaboration of all players in the field.
3. The following principles are to be followed in FIPA's specification development
4. As a rule FIPA should select and adapt existing
technologies and only occasionally develop its own technologies.
Therefore FIPA should keep close contact with formal standards
bodies, industry consortia and government agencies, such as ARPA,
CEC, DAVIC, IETF, MPEG, OMG, TINA, W3C etc.
5. It is FIPA's intent to specify tools that can then be
assembled to provide systems of practical interest. It is the
responsibility of the subsystem integrator to ensure that the
overall system is fit for purpose and complies with all relevant
regulatory requirements.
6. The FIPA specification development activity should be based
on a workplan, organised in work items. Each work item will
identify a date of completion and a list of subsystems whose
specification is believed to be feasible by the agreed date and
whose enabling technology is believed to become available for use
by around the date of work item completion.
7. As a rule FIPA should issue Calls for Proposals to acquire
information on candidate technologies for the subsystems to
specify in the context of a work item. Such Calls should be
public and anybody, member and non-member, may submit his
technologies for consideration by FIPA.
8. FIPA specifications should be of two kinds: normative and
informative. A specification is normative when it mandates
the behaviour of a subsystem to ensure interoperability with
other FIPA-specified subsystems. A specification is
informative when its aim is to provide guidance to industry
on some particular aspects of a subsystem.
9. FIPA Members (companies, organisations, governmental
institutions etc.) will pay yearly membership fees, have right to
vote on matters that require this instrument and allowed to join
the technical committees developing technical specifications.
10. The following items are considered to be candidate for specification by FIPA in the near term (e.g. end '97). It is reminded that FIPA does not intend to specify the internal behaviour of the subsystems listed.
12. The draft document "FIPA Statutes" (FIPA6405) is
considered to be a good starting point. Participants are
encouraged to review the text with their lawyers.
13. The following is considered to be a first
attempt at a FIPA Workplan.
Work items |
State |
Month |
Year |
Action |
1st work item |
defined |
October |
1996 |
Call for Proposals issued |
started |
January |
1997 |
Proposals received |
|
completed |
December |
1997 |
Specification produced |
|
2nd work item |
defined |
October |
1997 |
Call for Proposals issued |
started |
January |
1998 |
Proposals received |
|
completed |
December? |
1998? |
Specification produced |
|
3rd work item |
defined |
October? |
1998? |
Call for Proposals issued |
14 A good representation of the following communities is an urgent task for FIPA:
15. A "Recruiting Committee" is established for the
purpose of enlarging community and country representation in FIPA
(Annex 2).
16. The next FIPA meeting is tentatively scheduled to be held
on 24-26 June in the New York area. The main purpose of the next
meeting will be the holding of a workshop with the goal of
refining the list of specification items that are believed to be
achievable in 1997 and a first identification of those items that
will actually be specified in that time frame. An organising
committee is established (Annex 3).
17. The next-to-next meeting is planned to be held in October, ideally in Asia.
18. A press release is approved (Annex 4)
19. Information relevant to FIPA is found on http://www.cselt.it/ufv/leonardo/fipa.htm. This page will be constantly updated with new information. Discussion groups will be established shortly and notice will be given to participants and other interested individuals. Discussion groups, besides the "Recruiting" and "Organising" committees will be open to individuals requesting to join.
20. Participant would like to express their thanks to Prof. Mamdani, Dr. Jeremy Pitt and Ms. Jenny Jarvis (Imperial College) and Dr. Richard Nicol, Prof. Robin Smith and Nader Azarmi (British Telecom) for hosting and supporting this first FIPA meeting.
21. The Chairman of the meeting would like to express his
personal thanks to the hosts of the meeting, Imperial College and
British Telecom and to the participant who have believed in his
vision, have accepted to come to this meeting and gave him very
high intellectual reward by sharing most of his proposals. The
Chairman looks forward to cooperating with them and future
members to establish and run an organisation with such
challenging goals.
Annex 1
Attendance list
W. Neuhäuser | IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH | DE |
F. Seide | Philips GmbH | DE |
H. Haugeneder | Siemens AG | DE |
R. Kober | Siemens AG | DE |
P. Haikonen | NOKIA Research Center | FI |
M. Dupont | Alcatel Alsthom Recherche | FR |
A. Kruchten | Alcatel Telecom | FR |
C. Pinaud | Centre Commun Etudes de Télédiffusion et Télécommunications | FR |
M. Bellanger | Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers | FR |
F. Arlabosse | Framentec-Cognitec | FR |
J. Guichard | France Télécom | FR |
L. Chiariglione | Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. | IT |
F. Malabocchia | Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. | IT |
G. Garibotto | Elsag Bailey SpA | IT |
B. Caprile | Istituto per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica | IT |
G. Adorni | Università degli Studi di Parma | IT |
T. Kogure | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | JP |
R. Kishimoto | Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. | JP |
M. Mizukawa | Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. | JP |
K. Kageyama | Sony Corp. | JP |
C. Numaoka | Sony Corp. | JP |
J. Eklundh | Royal Institute of Technology | SE |
C. Nycander | Telia AB | SE |
G. Granlund | Universitetet i Linköping | SE |
N. Azarmi | British Telecom Laboratories | UK |
R. Nicol | British Telecom Laboratories | UK |
R. Smith | British Telecom Laboratories | UK |
I. Dixon | Department of Trade and Industry | UK |
D. Oliver | IBM UK | UK |
E. Mamdani | Imperial College | UK |
J. Pitt | Imperial College | UK |
P. Wavish | Philips Research Laboratories | UK |
P. Gibbins | Sharp Laboratories of Europe | UK |
P. Schirling | IBM Technology Products | US |
Annex 2
Recruiting Committee:
Mandate:
Members
Wilhelm Neuhäuser, | IBM, | DE | neuhaeus@vnet.ibm.com |
Francois Arlobosse, | Framentec-Cognitec | FR | farlabosse@framentec.fr |
Leonardo Chiariglione | CSELT, | IT | leonardo.chiariglione@cselt.it |
Takuyo Kogure, | Matsushita Electric | JP | Kogure@drl.mei.co.jp |
(to be appointed), | NTT, | JP | |
Gösta Granlund, | Uversity of Linköping, | SE | gosta@isy.liu.se |
Jan Eklundh, | Royal Institute of Techn. | SE | joe@bion.kth.se |
Richard Nicol, | BT, | UK | richard.nicol@bt-sys.bt.co.uk |
Pete Schirling, | IBM, | US | pete_schirling@vnet.ibm.com |
(Chair in bold)
Annex 3
Team to prepare next Meeting
Mandate:
Members:
Hans Haugeneder | Siemens | DE | hans.haugeneder@zfe.siemens.de |
Pete Schirling, | IBM | US | pete_schirling@vnet.ibm.com |
E. Mamdani, | Imperial College | UK | e.mamdani@ic.ac.uk |
G. Granlund, | University of Linköping | SE | gosta@isy.liu.se |
F. Arlabosse, | Framentec-Cognitec | FR | farlabosse@framentec.fr |
(Chair in bold)
Annex 4
Press release
A group of individuals from 26 companies, 8 countries and the
communities having a stake in agent technologies have gathered in
London on 18 and 19 April to discuss the establishment of the
Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA), an
international organisation to promote the industry of Intelligent
Physical Agents (IPA). IPAs are meant to include all devices
intended for the mass market, capable of executing actions, to
accomplish goals imparted by or in collaboration with human
beings or other IPAs, with a high degree of intelligence.
The group agreed that the most effective way of promoting the
industry of IPAs is by producing in a timely fashion
specifications of generic agent technologies that are usable
across a large number of IPAs and provide a high level of
interoperability with other applications.
The group also agreed that the goals should be realised
through the open international collaboration of all players in
the field.
A first list of agent capabilities that are candidate for
specification in the near term (by end of 1997) has been
prepared. A partial list include basic capabilities for:
All interested parties from all over the world are invited to
join in the creation of FIPA. To this end the next meeting will
be a workshop, held in the New York area on 24-26 June, with the
main goal of refining the list of specification items that are
believed to be achievable in 1997 and a first identification of
those items that will actually be specified in that time frame.
The group works towards completing the formation of FIPA and
establishing a workplan for 1997. The plan currently includes a
Call for Proposals to be issued at its third meeting in October
1996 and completion of a first specification by December 1997.
Further information can be obtained from:
http://www.cselt.it/ufv/leonardo/fipa.htm