FIPA 19/04/96 14:04
FOUNDATION FOR INTELLIGENT PHYSICAL AGENTS FIPA6411.doc
Source: L. Chiariglione  


Resolutions of the London meeting


The following resolutions have been approved by a group of individuals, whose names are given in the annex, from 26 companies and organisations, 8 countries and the communities having a stake in agent technologies.

1. An international organisation, called FIPA, should be established to promote the industry of Intelligent Physical Agents (IPA). IPAs are meant to include all devices intended for the mass market, capable of executing actions, to accomplish goals imparted by or in collaboration with human beings or other IPAs, with a high degree of intelligence.

2. The purpose of FIPA shall be pursued by: identifying, selecting, augmenting and developing in a timely fashion specifications of generic agent technologies that are usable across a large number of IPAs and provide a high level of interoperability with other applications.

The goals are realised through the open international collaboration of all players in the field.

3. The following principles are to be followed in FIPA's specification development

4. As a rule FIPA should select and adapt existing technologies and only occasionally develop its own technologies. Therefore FIPA should keep close contact with formal standards bodies, industry consortia and government agencies, such as ARPA, CEC, DAVIC, IETF, MPEG, OMG, TINA, W3C etc.

5. It is FIPA's intent to specify tools that can then be assembled to provide systems of practical interest. It is the responsibility of the subsystem integrator to ensure that the overall system is fit for purpose and complies with all relevant regulatory requirements.

6. The FIPA specification development activity should be based on a workplan, organised in work items. Each work item will identify a date of completion and a list of subsystems whose specification is believed to be feasible by the agreed date and whose enabling technology is believed to become available for use by around the date of work item completion.

7. As a rule FIPA should issue Calls for Proposals to acquire information on candidate technologies for the subsystems to specify in the context of a work item. Such Calls should be public and anybody, member and non-member, may submit his technologies for consideration by FIPA.

8. FIPA specifications should be of two kinds: normative and informative. A specification is normative when it mandates the behaviour of a subsystem to ensure interoperability with other FIPA-specified subsystems. A specification is informative when its aim is to provide guidance to industry on some particular aspects of a subsystem.

9. FIPA Members (companies, organisations, governmental institutions etc.) will pay yearly membership fees, have right to vote on matters that require this instrument and allowed to join the technical committees developing technical specifications.

10. The following items are considered to be candidate for specification by FIPA in the near term (e.g. end '97). It is reminded that FIPA does not intend to specify the internal behaviour of the subsystems listed.

  1. speech processing primitives (in & out)
  2. visual input primitives, e.g.
  3. visual output primitives, e.g.
  4. actuator primitives, e.g.
  5. fusion of information, e.g.
  6. support of cultural diversity
  7. active (or controllable) head-eye system
  8. finite set of basic message types/communication primitives (e.g. speech act vocabulary) for inter-agent communication
  9. composition operators for basic message types
  10. standard library of interaction protocols
  11. refinement of interaction protocols for specific tasks
  12. semantic information representation and cognitive architectures
  13. reference programming libraries
  14. agent programming human interface
  15. specification of minimal class library
  16. aspects of society of agents
  1. The following items should be considered as general design parameters to be considered in specification development:

12. The draft document "FIPA Statutes" (FIPA6405) is considered to be a good starting point. Participants are encouraged to review the text with their lawyers.

13. The following is considered to be a first attempt at a FIPA Workplan.

Work items      
State       
Month      
Year
Action         
1st work item  
defined
October
1996
Call for Proposals issued                 
               
started   
January     
1997
Proposals received     
               
completed   
December    
1997 
Specification produced         
                                                              
       
2nd work item  
defined     
October     
1997 
Call for Proposals issued 
               
started   
January     
1998 
Proposals received     
               
completed   
December?   
1998?
Specification produced         
 
       
3rd work item  
defined     
October?    
1998?
Call for Proposals issued

14 A good representation of the following communities is an urgent task for FIPA:

15. A "Recruiting Committee" is established for the purpose of enlarging community and country representation in FIPA (Annex 2).

16. The next FIPA meeting is tentatively scheduled to be held on 24-26 June in the New York area. The main purpose of the next meeting will be the holding of a workshop with the goal of refining the list of specification items that are believed to be achievable in 1997 and a first identification of those items that will actually be specified in that time frame. An organising committee is established (Annex 3).

17. The next-to-next meeting is planned to be held in October, ideally in Asia.

18. A press release is approved (Annex 4)

19. Information relevant to FIPA is found on http://www.cselt.it/ufv/leonardo/fipa.htm. This page will be constantly updated with new information. Discussion groups will be established shortly and notice will be given to participants and other interested individuals. Discussion groups, besides the "Recruiting" and "Organising" committees will be open to individuals requesting to join.

20. Participant would like to express their thanks to Prof. Mamdani, Dr. Jeremy Pitt and Ms. Jenny Jarvis (Imperial College) and Dr. Richard Nicol, Prof. Robin Smith and Nader Azarmi (British Telecom) for hosting and supporting this first FIPA meeting.

21. The Chairman of the meeting would like to express his personal thanks to the hosts of the meeting, Imperial College and British Telecom and to the participant who have believed in his vision, have accepted to come to this meeting and gave him very high intellectual reward by sharing most of his proposals. The Chairman looks forward to cooperating with them and future members to establish and run an organisation with such challenging goals.

Annex 1

Attendance list

W. Neuhäuser IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH DE
F. Seide Philips GmbH DE
H. Haugeneder Siemens AG DE
R. Kober Siemens AG DE
P. Haikonen NOKIA Research Center FI
M. Dupont Alcatel Alsthom Recherche FR
A. Kruchten Alcatel Telecom FR
C. Pinaud Centre Commun Etudes de Télédiffusion et Télécommunications FR
M. Bellanger Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers FR
F. Arlabosse Framentec-Cognitec FR
J. Guichard France Télécom FR
L. Chiariglione Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. IT
F. Malabocchia Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. IT
G. Garibotto Elsag Bailey SpA IT
B. Caprile Istituto per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica IT
G. Adorni Università degli Studi di Parma IT
T. Kogure Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. JP
R. Kishimoto Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. JP
M. Mizukawa Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. JP
K. Kageyama Sony Corp. JP
C. Numaoka Sony Corp. JP
J. Eklundh Royal Institute of Technology SE
C. Nycander Telia AB SE
G. Granlund Universitetet i Linköping SE
N. Azarmi British Telecom Laboratories UK
R. Nicol British Telecom Laboratories UK
R. Smith British Telecom Laboratories UK
I. Dixon Department of Trade and Industry UK
D. Oliver IBM UK UK
E. Mamdani Imperial College UK
J. Pitt Imperial College UK
P. Wavish Philips Research Laboratories UK
P. Gibbins Sharp Laboratories of Europe UK
P. Schirling IBM Technology Products US

Annex 2

Recruiting Committee:

Mandate:

  1. Provide names of and make contacts with individuals working for companies potentially interested in FIPA activities,
  1. Identification of potential nominees to BD is encouraged.


Members

Wilhelm Neuhäuser, IBM, DE neuhaeus@vnet.ibm.com
Francois Arlobosse, Framentec-Cognitec FR farlabosse@framentec.fr
Leonardo Chiariglione CSELT, IT leonardo.chiariglione@cselt.it
Takuyo Kogure, Matsushita Electric JP Kogure@drl.mei.co.jp
(to be appointed), NTT, JP  
Gösta Granlund, Uversity of Linköping, SE gosta@isy.liu.se
Jan Eklundh, Royal Institute of Techn. SE joe@bion.kth.se
Richard Nicol, BT, UK richard.nicol@bt-sys.bt.co.uk
Pete Schirling, IBM, US pete_schirling@vnet.ibm.com

(Chair in bold)

Annex 3

Team to prepare next Meeting

Mandate:

  1. To produce a call for contributions for the next meeting based on the list of the items identified at the London meeting.
  1. To prepare the workshop program


Members:

Hans Haugeneder Siemens DE hans.haugeneder@zfe.siemens.de
Pete Schirling, IBM US pete_schirling@vnet.ibm.com
E. Mamdani, Imperial College UK e.mamdani@ic.ac.uk
G. Granlund, University of Linköping SE gosta@isy.liu.se
F. Arlabosse, Framentec-Cognitec FR farlabosse@framentec.fr

(Chair in bold)

Annex 4

Press release

A group of individuals from 26 companies, 8 countries and the communities having a stake in agent technologies have gathered in London on 18 and 19 April to discuss the establishment of the Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA), an international organisation to promote the industry of Intelligent Physical Agents (IPA). IPAs are meant to include all devices intended for the mass market, capable of executing actions, to accomplish goals imparted by or in collaboration with human beings or other IPAs, with a high degree of intelligence.

The group agreed that the most effective way of promoting the industry of IPAs is by producing in a timely fashion specifications of generic agent technologies that are usable across a large number of IPAs and provide a high level of interoperability with other applications.

The group also agreed that the goals should be realised through the open international collaboration of all players in the field.

A first list of agent capabilities that are candidate for specification in the near term (by end of 1997) has been prepared. A partial list include basic capabilities for:

  1. human-agent interaction (e.g. speech input/output primitives)
  2. agent-to-agent interaction (e.g. finite set of basic message types / communication primitives and standard library of interaction protocols)
  3. aspects of societies of agents (e.g. authentication, privacy, delegation)
  4. interaction with the physical world (e.g. sensors and actuators).

All interested parties from all over the world are invited to join in the creation of FIPA. To this end the next meeting will be a workshop, held in the New York area on 24-26 June, with the main goal of refining the list of specification items that are believed to be achievable in 1997 and a first identification of those items that will actually be specified in that time frame.

The group works towards completing the formation of FIPA and establishing a workplan for 1997. The plan currently includes a Call for Proposals to be issued at its third meeting in October 1996 and completion of a first specification by December 1997.

Further information can be obtained from:

http://www.cselt.it/ufv/leonardo/fipa.htm